EPISODE 163 – REAL LEADERS INTERCEDE

I serve my generation first through intercession
I lead by the strength of the Lord
I am a global icon

The terms ‘development’ and ‘fidelity’ are examples of what the philosopher WB Gallie has called ‘essentially controversial concepts’. These concepts are difficult to define as they are contested by different groups with different values ​​and interests. In contrast to these concepts, others are “well defined” and have clear criteria for their application. In this essay, I will examine the value of fundamentally questionable concepts such as development and fidelity, and how they differ from well-defined concepts. Let us first consider the term “development”. It is a term used in various contexts, from economic development to personal development. The controversial nature of this concept stems from the fact that different groups have different ideas about what constitutes development. For some, development can mean economic growth and greater prosperity, while for others it can mean a more equitable and equitable distribution of resources. The value of this inherently controversial concept lies in its ability to spark debate and discussion about what we as a society should be looking for. By participating in these debates, we can better understand what we mean by development and how we can work towards it. The term “loyalty” can also be fundamentally questioned. Loyalty is often used in the context of relationships, where it refers to faithfulness or loyalty. However, what constitutes loyalty can vary greatly depending on the cultural and social context. For some, fidelity can mean sexual exclusivity, while for others it can mean emotional intimacy or shared values. Again, the value of this concept lies in its ability to stimulate discussion and debate about what we understand by fidelity and how we can work towards it in our relationships. In contrast to these fundamentally controversial concepts, others are clearly defined and have clear criteria for their application. For example, the term “gravity” is well-defined and can be measured using clear criteria. Likewise, the term “temperature” can be measured with a thermometer and has clear criteria for its application. These concepts are not challenged as they are based on empirical evidence and can be objectively measured. The value of fundamentally questionable concepts lies in their ability to stimulate debate and discussion about important issues. By participating in these debates, we can better understand what we mean by development, fidelity, and other controversial concepts. This can lead to more informed decision-making and better outcomes for society as a whole. However, it is important to realize that these concepts are not well defined and different groups may have them.